Video size: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Show player controls
i think people should do it like copyright. after a hundred years or so the face is public domain.
The Crow ?
For a lot of them though, it looks like a ghost is wearing the dead actor's face, just digitally, and it's creepy af..
Oh, the mask thing for Peter Cushing makes a ton of sense now. Just about everyone has seen Cushing's performance in the originals so we probably subconsciously know how his facial muscles would flex and deform and so on when he speaks, when he smiles, when he expresses. I think what's happening (or a good part of it) is that CGI Tarkin's facial muscles don't move the way you expect but kinda like it's a rubber face mask instead.
I'm sure it's legally possible to own your own likeness and if I was a celebrity I definitely would. Think about how quickly your career could be ruined by someone using a deep fake.
If an actor is alive then I would say you can't do it without their permission since they ARE their intellectual and actual property. If that person is deceased and the family would give their blessing to it for whatever reason they deem to be acceptable, then the criticism rests with the artists.
I was waiting for them to talk about Brandon Lee in The Crow
Nice Tekken reference lol
I had no problem with Tarkin, but Lea was AWFUL. Her mouth moved all wrong.
Surprised they forgot to mention Brandon Lee from The Crow.
For the "Grandma" Tarkin scene, I think it's the emotions displayed and some of the motion that makes it seem fake. When we express any emotion with our face, the eyes change too, I don't see that being properly conveyed. Another issue seems to be how a lot of the facial motions are disjointed. As in for a certain motion/emotion the mouth and chin region might be moving but the eye region is completely static. I feel the old Disney 2D animation artists were masters at capturing that expression completely and really well. As in depict those emotions/expressions with the eyes and mouth.
Dudes, please. This whole video is gold, but this last part is the best i've seen on a music video https://youtu.be/46rJ4y2kdow?t=219
one does own their physical likeness. if you were to recreate an "identifiable' person with Computer graphics the creator is subject to copyright infringement. The persons "identifiable likeness" is part of copyright. Now you could make a 'deformed" looking Tom Cruise as long as it is different enough to claim "incidental" likeness. Or you could make straight up Tom Cruise and try to claim "parody" which is protected by copyright law as "fair use"...but I don't know enough about "image likeness" as it pertains to "fair use" to know how that is or isn't protected by "fair use" image law (my specialty is in music). So I say fuck it....make Tom Cruise CGI rep the shit out of your channel....and if you get a shitty letter....ask for forgiveness. But it'll be a sick video. Just blame Zenu and say your corrupted alien energy made you do it......he has to relate to that shit. lol
I think u never seen the Kochadaiyaan movie from Bollywood 😋😋😄😄
wtf i didnt know they did that in gladiator
6:42 they horizontally flip the CG head (look at the hair line)
The guy in the left never say something interesting